𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The psychological processing of traumatic experience: Rorschach patterns in PTSD

✍ Scribed by Bessel A. van der Kolk; Charles P. Ducey


Publisher
Springer
Year
1989
Tongue
English
Weight
872 KB
Volume
2
Category
Article
ISSN
0894-9867

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Rorschach records of 13 Vietnam veterans with PTSD were compared with 1.1 matched combat controls and were analyzed for both content and structural features. These Rorschachs showed an unmodified reliving of traumatic material and revealed the biphasic cognitive processing of traumatic experiences of rigidly defended, affective numbing versus overwhelmed intrusive reliving. They demonstrated how trauma and its concomitant affects persist with little modification over time and confirm the clinical impression that people with severe PTSD have an impaired capacity for affect modulation. The lack of integration of the traumatic experience accounts for extreme reactivity to environmental stimuli: the initially overwhelming external event, through lack of assimilation, is perpetuated internally and continues to exert disorganizing effects on the psyche. The authors discuss the claims that the presence of mute, unsymbolized, and unintegrated experiences causes reenactment of the trauma, until the victim learns to put into words both the associated facts and the feelings.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


The rorschach and ptsd revisited: Critiq
✍ Leo Cohen; Corine de Ruiter 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 512 KB

## An article which appeared in the Journal of Traumatic Stress, 2: 259-274, on the Rorschach and PTSD, i s criticized on methodological and general scholarly grounh. Special focus was given to the authors' treatment of Rorschach protocoLr and Rorschach data. The scienti' contributions of the stud

The psychological processing of traumati
✍ Charles P. Ducey; Bessel A. van der Kolk 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 438 KB

## Abstract A critique of our Rorschach research on the experience, symbolization, and psychological processing of trauma makes some valid points, but overlooks both the study's exploratory, hypothesis‐generating nature and our integration of historical, clinical, psychotherapeutic, and empirical p