## An article which appeared in the Journal of Traumatic Stress, 2: 259-274, on the Rorschach and PTSD, i s criticized on methodological and general scholarly grounh. Special focus was given to the authors' treatment of Rorschach protocoLr and Rorschach data. The scienti' contributions of the stud
The psychological processing of traumatic experience: Reply to Cohen and de Ruiter
✍ Scribed by Charles P. Ducey; Bessel A. van der Kolk
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1991
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 438 KB
- Volume
- 4
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-9867
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
A critique of our Rorschach research on the experience, symbolization, and psychological processing of trauma makes some valid points, but overlooks both the study's exploratory, hypothesis‐generating nature and our integration of historical, clinical, psychotherapeutic, and empirical perspectives. Our examination of the relationship of trauma to inner symbolization and to emotional responsiveness to the environment reveals the critics' narrow understanding of the Rorschach and misconceptions regarding trauma. Further research cited replicates but also challenges our initial findings.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Our critique of van der Kolk and Ducey's (1989) article pointed out a number of errors