The problem of evil and the paradox of friendly atheism
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1985
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 540 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7047
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
From ancient times philosophers and theologians have debated the significance of suffering and other forms of evil for the belief that the world is the creation of a wholly good, omniscient, and omnipotent being -God. Briefly, two major positions on this question are possible: (1) that God and evil are incompatible, forcing us to reject either theism or the reality of evil 1 ; and (2) that God and evil are not incompatible, allowing the theist to recognize, while having to explain, the reality of evil. 2 Historically, atheists have tended to support the first position and theists the second, but, in an important article "The Problem of Evil and Some Varities of Atheism, ''3 William L. Rowe argues for the possibility of a form of atheism ("friendly atheism") which recognizes the logical compatibility of God and evil but holds that the great amount and variety of human and animal suffering makes it reasonable to be an atheist, though it neither disproves theism nor does it require the atheist to regard the theist as being irrational.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
**Grantchester Mysteries 4** ** **It is the 1960s and Canon Sidney Chambers is enjoying his first year of married life with his German bride Hildegard. But life in Grantchester rarely stays quiet for long. Our favourite clerical detective soon attempts to stop a serial killer who has a grie
This paper argues that the logical coherence of classical theism can be defended through the traditional free-wiU defense and argument from divine omniscience and human finitude, but only at the cost of moral scepticism. The above two-pronged defense entails moral scepticism because it demands that
In a recent paper, Keith Yandetl introduces an argument which seems to make short work of the problem of evil .1 Unfortunately, this line of argument is radically unsatisfactory, and the problem which the existence of evil poses for theism whatever that problem is -cannot be disposed of in that read