Herrmann and Yoder lay some serious charges at the door of psychologists researching the `implanted memory' paradigm, and in so doing raise important ethical issues that apply to other researchers studying children's testimony. For this reason alone, their paper is a helpful addition to the debate o
The potential effects of the implanted memory paradigm on child subjects
โ Scribed by Douglas Herrmann; Carol Yoder
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 146 KB
- Volume
- 12
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0888-4080
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The purpose of this article is to examine the appropriate use of the implanted memory paradigm with children. In this paradigm, participants are asked repeatedly about ยฎctitious events that never transpired. The responses of children in these investigations demonstrate clearly that they can be led to unintentionally create false memories. This article addresses whether memory research should continue to encourage children to create memories for events that never happened. The literature in other areas of psychology suggests that deception may lessen respect for authority, aect a child's self-esteem, and create stress. We propose that the use of the implanted memory paradigm be suspended indeยฎnitely or until appropriate research demonstrates that the paradigm does not aect children negatively.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Psychologists who carry out research with human subjects, especially young children, have special responsibilities to consider the ethical implications of their work. In this regard, Herrmann and Yoder raise a number of important issues about the potential consequences of continued research on a top
In this commentary, we respond to Herrmann and Yoder's call for a cessation of memory implantation research with children. Although we agree that it is important to safeguard subjects from harm, we argue that Herrmann and Yoder's denunciation of this ยฎeld of research is not empirically or logically
An experiment is reported using a list-learning paradigm in which all the words have a common associate, which is known to be frequently but erroneously recalled. Four experimental conditions were used. One group was instructed to think about the meanings of the words, another to relate them to pers