ersistent discrepancies between implied forward rates on the yield curve P and corresponding futures rates have been widely observed. For instance, in one of our samples, eight week-ahead forward-future spreads averaged nearly 70 discount basis points before 1982 and have since averaged about 30 bas
The municipal-treasury futures spread
โ Scribed by Marcelle Arak; Raj Daryanani; Philip Fischer; Laurie Goodman
- Book ID
- 102843907
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1987
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 852 KB
- Volume
- 7
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-7314
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
ith the debut of the municipal bond index futures contract in June of 1985, W market participants began keeping a watchful eye on the municipal-Treasury futures spread. This spread has varied widely, ranging from a low of negative eight points up to a high of plus 10% points. This has led market participants to question whether or not muni futures are being priced appropriately relative to Treasury futures.
If, in fact, one market is mispriced relative to another, one can often profit from the situation by purchasing the underpriced security and shorting the other. It is particularly easy to utilize such opportunities in the futures markets. Transactions costs for futures trades are very low-ranging from $12 to $25 per contract. By contrast, arbitrage that involves the use of the cash market can be expensive for nondealers, particularly if it involves shorting a security; it is difficult to short municipal bonds, even for dealer firms. Thus the municipal-Treasury futures spread can help keep municipal futures closer to their theoretical level.
In this article, after presenting a brief overview of the municipal futures contract, we develop a model of the theoretical range for the muni futures-Treasury futures spread (the MOB). Comparing actual spreads with our theoretical model, we show that in its early months the municipal futures contract was mispriced, and this was reflected in the MOB spread. More recently, however, the MOB has usually traded *The authors would like to thank John M. Cheney, and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments. This article was written while all authors were affiliated with Citicorp Investment Bank.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
rity or call. As of this writing, there are over 20-issues "good" for delivery. Typically, however, only a handful of these issues are actually delivered during a particular contract month. In fact, on any given date, deliveries tend to be dominated by a single issue. These circumstances may be att
## Futures Market Destabilize the Treasury Bond Cash Market? Gary A. Bortz I. INTRODUCTION everal market professionals and economists have suggested that financial fu-S tures markets may be contributing to the volatility of interest rates. The most prevalent argument is that futures markets are i
wning a security with a guaranteed future sale price and date is (almost) 0 equivalent to a short-term investment extending to the sale date. Yet, in the Treasury bond futures market the prices seem too low to provide a fair rate of return to those who short T-bond futures. That is, the short term i
## Abstract The paper conducts a regression analysis utilizing both futures and cash market prices and net orderflow to determine where price discovery takes place as well as the forces at play that influence the location. Specifically, given the strong theoretical linkage between the U.S. Treasury