rity or call. As of this writing, there are over 20-issues "good" for delivery. Typically, however, only a handful of these issues are actually delivered during a particular contract month. In fact, on any given date, deliveries tend to be dominated by a single issue. These circumstances may be att
Treasury bond futures: Valuing the delivery options
โ Scribed by Marcelle Arak; Laurie S. Goodman
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1987
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 932 KB
- Volume
- 7
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-7314
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
wning a security with a guaranteed future sale price and date is (almost) 0 equivalent to a short-term investment extending to the sale date. Yet, in the Treasury bond futures market the prices seem too low to provide a fair rate of return to those who short T-bond futures. That is, the short term interest rate implicit in a long cash T-bondshort T-bond futures position is below the rep0 rate observed in the cash markets. Over the last several years, the difference between implied short-term interest rate (usually referred to as the implied rep0 rate) and the actual rep0 rate has been on the order of 250 basis points. In explaining this, market analysts have noted that there are two peculiarities in the bond delivery process which favor the individual who has the short position and cause bond futures to trade for less than their theoretical price.
The first of these peculiarities is what is often called the "wild card" or daily option on Treasury bond futures. During the delivery month the holder of a short position has until 9 p.m. (NY time) to notify the exchange of the intention to deliver.
The invoice price is calculated from the futures settlement price at 3 P.m. (NY time) on the day notice is given. Since the cash market is open until 5 p.m. (NY time), or two hours more, there is a possibility of buying cheaply late in the day and selling at the pre-established price. This possibility exists for these two hours each day during the delivery month.
The second delivery quirk is often called the implicit put option or "end of month" option which applies to the last seven business days of the delivery month. The authors would like to thank Martin Kratchman, Mark Landau, Glenn Picou and especially Scott Levy for greatly increasing our understanding of the delivery options, and David Emanuel and an anonymous referee of this Journal for helpful comments. We would also like to thank Robert K. Y. Chan, Raj Daryanani, Judy Jonson and Susan Ross for their excellent research and programming assistance. 'We say almost because if a coupon drop occurs during the holding period, the investment of the coupon sum does not have a guaranteed return.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
ptions on financial futures are relatively new financial instruments, although 0 options on commodities have been in existence since the Nineteenth Century. 'See Johnson (1982a) for a chronology of the historical developments in commodity option trading. Trading in options on nonfarm futures contrac
considerable body of literature has developed concerning the cheapest bond A to deliver against the Chicago Board of Trade Treasury Bond futures contracts. The investor who is short in this contract has the option to deliver one out of many possible bonds. A number of authors have argued that this
ike many other futures contracts, the Treasury Bond (T-Bond) futures contract L allows the holder of a short position to satisfy the contract by delivering one of the variety of T-Bonds on one of a number of delivery dates. Accordingly, the traditional approach to pricing such contracts has concentr
## Futures Market Destabilize the Treasury Bond Cash Market? Gary A. Bortz I. INTRODUCTION everal market professionals and economists have suggested that financial fu-S tures markets may be contributing to the volatility of interest rates. The most prevalent argument is that futures markets are i