✦ LIBER ✦

The Modal Ontological Argument--A Reply to Kane and Morris

✍ Scribed by P. J. McGrath

Book ID: 125557298
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Year: 1986
Tongue: English
Weight: 129 KB
Volume: 95
Category: Article
ISSN: 0026-4423
DOI: 10.2307/2254077

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The modal ontological argument and the n

The modal ontological argument and the necessary a posteriori

✍ J. William Forgie 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 779 KB

It does not seem difficult to construct a concept of God such that if God possibly exists then He actually exists. Let "is divine" be short for "is omnipotent, omniscient and perfectly good." Then suppose we understand God to be a being who is divine in all possible worlds. If this concept is instan

The Ontological Status of Embryos: A Rep

The Ontological Status of Embryos: A Reply to Jason Morris

✍ Lee, P.; Tollefsen, C.; George, R. P. 📂 Article 📅 2014 🏛 Oxford University Press 🌐 English ⚖ 391 KB

Ontological Arguments and the Superiorit

Ontological Arguments and the Superiority of Existence: Reply to Nagasawa

✍ Millican, P. 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Oxford University Press 🌐 English ⚖ 125 KB

The Role and Limits of Analogical Argume

The Role and Limits of Analogical Argument: a Reply to Aronovitch

✍ Michael Lessnoff 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 120 KB

A Hard-line Reply to the Multiple-Case M

A Hard-line Reply to the Multiple-Case Manipulation Argument

✍ DERK PEREBOOM 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 76 KB

The fallacy of the excluded argument: A

The fallacy of the excluded argument: A reply to Ford and Cragg

✍ John McMurtry 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 266 KB