Section 162(m) Employee stock option Unintended consequence Executive compensation Dividend yield Share price volatility In 1993, Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code was passed into law with the intent to reign in outsized executive compensation by eliminating the tax-deductibility of
β¦ LIBER β¦
The Law of Unintended Consequences?
β Scribed by John F. Rothrock
- Book ID
- 109100973
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 32 KB
- Volume
- 51
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0017-8748
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
IRC Section 162(m) and the law of uninte
β
Kenneth R. Ferris; James S. Wallace
π
Article
π
2009
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 408 KB
Beware: The Misuse of Technology and the
β
John M. Freeman
π
Article
π
2007
π
Springer-Verlag
π
English
β 72 KB
Gender Identity Politics, Human Subjects
β
Brian A. Gladue
π
Article
π
2008
π
Springer US
π
English
β 96 KB
UK anaesthetic training and the law of u
β
P. M. Spargo
π
Article
π
2005
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 58 KB
Anti-keylogging measures for secure Inte
Anti-keylogging measures for secure Internet login: An example of the law of unintended consequences
β
Stuart P. Goring; Joseph R. Rabaiotti; Antonia J. Jones
π
Article
π
2007
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 302 KB
Some unintended consequences of job desi
β
Gary Johns
π
Article
π
2010
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 81 KB
By intent or default, all jobs have a design that constitutes a context for their incumbents, and that design is embedded in a larger work context. The purpose of this article is to examine the unintended and sometimes negative consequences of job designs and their related contexts. Several themes w