✦ LIBER ✦

The Influence of Self-Threats on Fairness Judgments and Affective Measures

✍ Scribed by Joost Miedemam; Kees van den Bos; Riël Vermunt

Publisher: Springer
Year: 2006
Tongue: English
Weight: 310 KB
Volume: 19
Category: Article
ISSN: 0885-7466
DOI: 10.1007/s11211-006-0007-7

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Are you what you feel? The affective and

Are you what you feel? The affective and cognitive determinants of self-judgments

✍ Stephen R. Levine; Robert S. Wyer Jr.; Norbert Schwarz 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 989 KB

The effect of procedural and interaction

The effect of procedural and interactional criteria on procedural fairness judgments

✍ R. Vermunt; W. A. Van der Kloot; J. Van der Meer 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 895 KB

The effects of procedural aspects and ou

The effects of procedural aspects and outcome salience on procedural fairness judgments

✍ Gerda Koper; Riel Vermunt 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 974 KB

The influence of context on residents’ e

The influence of context on residents’ evaluations: effects of priming on clinical judgment and affect

✍ P. W. Teunissen; D. A. Stapel; F. Scheele; A. J. J. A. Scherpbier; K. Boor; J. A 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 333 KB

The relationship of the outcome and proc

The relationship of the outcome and procedural fairness: How does knowing the outcome influence judgments about the procedure?

✍ Tom R. Tyler 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 820 KB

The effects of social context, source fa

The effects of social context, source fairness, and perceived self-source similarity on social influence: a self-categorisation analysis

✍ Michael J. Platow; Duncan Mills; Dianne Morrison 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 148 KB 👁 2 views

Based upon a self-categorisation analysis of social in¯uence (Turner, 1991), we predicted that individuals who self-categorise with the source of a communication would align their own private attitudes more closely with the source when that source was distributively fair rather than unfair in an int