## Abstract ## Background. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychosocial impact of disfigurement, gender, and social support after surgical treatment of head and neck cancer. ## Method. Eightyโtwo ambulatory head and neck cancer patients, 6 months or more after treatment and free of
The impact of head and neck cancer and facial disfigurement on the quality of life of patients and their partners
โ Scribed by Lindsey E. Vickery; Gary Latchford; Jenny Hewison; Maggie Bellew; Tricia Feber
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 89 KB
- Volume
- 25
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1043-3074
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Background:
Psychological and physical stresses from head and neck cancer can be substantial for patients and partners. there is minimal research exploring treatment impact, particularly facial disfigurement after surgery.
Materials and methods:
Twenty-eight surgery and radiotherapy/brachytherapy/chemoradiation patients and 25 of their partners were compared with 23 radiotherapy/brachytherapy patients and 19 partners. participants completed the hospital anxiety and depression scale, psychosocial adaptation to illness scale, dyadic adjustment scale, and european organisation for research and treatment of cancer quality of life scale, including the head and neck cancer module. the dropkin disfigurement and dysfunction scale classified surgical impairment.
Results:
Partners reported greater distress than patients on some scales. patients did not have a lower quality of life compared with normal populations and other cancer patients. however, on the eortc they did and were comparable to a normed sample of head and neck cancer patients. treatment modality was not predictive of psychological vulnerability.
Discussion:
Head and neck cancer patients do not necessarily experience poor quality of life. the disease can have a significant impact on partners.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Background. To employ patient-reported speech outcome data collected on head and neck cancer (HNC) surveys, there is a need to determine (1) the relationship of patient ratings to speech language pathologist (SLP) ratings and (2) whether patients' attitudes toward their speech are an important eleme
## Abstract ## Background. Xerostomia is a common, debilitating complication of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. This article reviews the pathogenesis of radiationโinduced xerostomia, its impact on quality of life (QOL), and treatment options. ## Methods. Virtually all patients u
## Abstract ## Background Cancer cachexia is a debilitating, wasting condition that affects many cancer patients, including those with head and neck cancer. The overall incidence of cancer cachexia is quite high for some types of cancer, and cachexia will be the main cause of death for more than 2
## Abstract ## Background. A longitudinal, prospective, caseโcontrol study evaluated if a psychosocial support program improved healthโrelated quality of life (HRQL) in head and neck (H&N) cancer patients. ## Methods. One hundred fortyโfour H&N cancer patients were included: 52 study patients an
## Abstract ## __Background.__ The management of patients with head and neck cancer is complex, and implementation of an integrated care program might improve the quality of care. ## __Methods.__ A prospective beforeโafter study was performed in 1 clinic for head and neck oncology on 311 adults