𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The hedging effectiveness of options and futures: A mean-gini approach

✍ Scribed by C. Sherman Cheung; Clarence C. Y. Kwan; Patrick C. Y. Yip


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1990
Tongue
English
Weight
789 KB
Volume
10
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-7314

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


T eration of the types of instruments on various organized exchanges and by the increasing trading volume of each instrument since the first futures contracts on foreign currencies were introduced by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange in 1972 and the establishment of the Chicago Board Options Exchange in 1973. The usual economic rationale for futures and options is that they facilitate hedging. In other words, these instruments enable investors who hold the underlying assets to transfer the risk of price change to individuals who are more willing to bear such risk.

In the case of financial futures, their hedging effectiveness has been extensively studied by various researchers. Following the mean-variance portfolio approach, researchers usually examine the change in risk as futures are introduced into a portfolio containing the underlying assets. Examples are Ederington's (1979) study of futures written on two debt instruments (GNMA's and T-bills), Figlewski's (1984 and 1985) studies of futures written on stock indices, and Hill and Schneeweis ' (1981 and 1982) studies of futures written on currencies, among others. In the case of options, Chang and Shanker (1986) have examined the hedging effectiveness of currency options. Paralleling these and other empirical studies are the theoretical developments of hedging performance by Howard and D'Antonio (1984) and Bell and Krasker (1986), among others.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Estimating the extended mean-gini coeffi
✍ Donald Lien; Xiangdong Luo πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 622 KB

We are thankful to De-Min Wu and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. A. G. Malliaris at Loyola University of Chicago kindly provided the data for this research. Of course, we are responsible for any remaining errors.

An empirical evaluation of the extended
✍ Robert W. Kolb; John Okunev πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1992 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 566 KB

See Shalit and Yitzhaki (1984), p. 1467. \*he return on the futures contract is defined as the percentage change in the futures price. Strictly speaking, however, futures contracts have no return because they require no investment. Identifying the percentage price change on the futures as the future

The hedging effectiveness of currency fu
✍ Dr. Charles Dale πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1981 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 751 KB

ntil very recently, commodity futures markets were largely ignored by the U vast majority of economists. At the same time, markets for foreign currencies were studied by only a relative handful of specialists in international trade and finance. This article describes an area which overlaps the two v

A note on the hedging effectiveness of f
✍ Joanne Hill; Thomas Schneeweis πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1981 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 328 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

T w o recent studies [Hill and Schneeweis (H&S) (forthcoming) and Dale (1981)l

Does an index futures split enhance trad
✍ Lars NordΓ©n πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 305 KB

## Abstract Recently, several stock index futures exchanges have experimented with an altered contract design to make the contract more attractive and to increase investor accessibility. In 1998, the Swedish futures exchange (OM) split the OMX‐index futures contract with a factor of 4:1, without al