See Shalit and Yitzhaki (1984), p. 1467. \*he return on the futures contract is defined as the percentage change in the futures price. Strictly speaking, however, futures contracts have no return because they require no investment. Identifying the percentage price change on the futures as the future
Estimating the extended mean-gini coefficient for futures hedging
โ Scribed by Donald Lien; Xiangdong Luo
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 622 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-7314
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
We are thankful to De-Min Wu and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. A. G. Malliaris at Loyola University of Chicago kindly provided the data for this research. Of course, we are responsible for any remaining errors.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
T eration of the types of instruments on various organized exchanges and by the increasing trading volume of each instrument since the first futures contracts on foreign currencies were introduced by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange in 1972 and the establishment of the Chicago Board Options Exchange
The extended Gini coefficient, C, is a measure of dispersion with strong theoretical merit for use in futures hedging. Yitzhaki (1982Yitzhaki ( , 1983) ) provides conditions under which a two-parameter framework using the mean and C of portfolio returns yields an efficient set consistent with second
2Cecchetti, Cumby, and Figlewski (1988) apply ARCH in estimating an optimal futures hedge with Treasury bonds. Baillie and Myers (199 1) and Myers (1991) examine commodity futures and report improvements in hedging performance over the constant hedge approach by following a dynamic strategy based o