The effects of smoking on electrocortical arousal in coronary prone (Type A) and non-coronary prone (Type B) subjects
β Scribed by Paul M. Cinciripini
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1986
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 698 KB
- Volume
- 90
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0033-3158
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Twenty-nine Type A subjects, (> 75 percentile on the Jenkins Activity Survey) and 28 Type Bs (< 25 percentile of the survey) were asked to smoke one cigarette (1.0 mg nicotine, 16 mg tar, 14 mg CO) using a standardized smoking procedure. Significant differences between baseline and smoking conditions were noted in the distribution of electrocortical activity for both groups. In addition, a shift from EEG low frequency high amplitude (alpha) events to high frequency low amplitude activity (beta) was noted for the As, while the Bs showed enhanced very low frequency high amplitude (theta) activity. A striking parallel was observed between the behavioral predisposition of the subject (A/B) and the possible function of the underlying neurological structure mediating the observed EEG changes. It is suggested that the electrocortical changes observed for the As during smoking are mediated by reticular (ARS I) arousal. Enhanced reticular activity may coincide with an increased rate of information processing, attention and vigilance. On the other hand, the electrocortical changes observed for the Type Bs may represent enhanced activity of the limbic system (ARS II) with could coincide with stimulation of the reward/pleasure centers. Smoking may produce a pattern of neurophysiological arousal which parallels the behavioral tempo of the individual. Possible differences in in vivo regulation of nicotine cholinergic binding sites are also discussed.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The sympathetic nervous system may contribute to excessive hepatic glucose output in Type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus and could be implicated in the interrelated problem of hypertension. The aim of these studies was to determine whether subjects with Type 2 diabetes had normal sensit