𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The effect of the position of the axis of rotation on the discomfort caused by whole-body roll and pitch vibrations of seated persons

✍ Scribed by K.C. Parsons; M.J. Griffin


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1978
Tongue
English
Weight
872 KB
Volume
58
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-460X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Methods of predicting the discomfort caused by rotational vibration of subjects seated away from the axis of rotation from a knowledge of the discomfort caused by single-axis vibration were investigated. The method of category production was used, in which ten seated subjects adjusted the level of sinusoidal vibration until it could be described as "uncomfortable" on a given semantic scale. Judgments were made for four frequencies (2, 4, 8 and 16 Hz) for vibrations in each of five single-axis motions (roll, pitch, fore-and-aft, lateral, vertical) and for roll and pitch vibrations with subjects sitting various distances and directions away from the axis of rotation.

For similar vibration conditions there was no difference in levels described as "uncomfortable" between vibration in the fore-and-aft and lateral axes. Rotational vibration in "pure" roll produced greater discomfort than the same level and frequency of rotational vibration in "pure" pitch. Sensitivity to vibration acceleration decreased with increasing frequency in the fore-and-aft, lateral, roll and pitch axes. Sensitivity to vertical acceleration showed only a small decrease with increasing frequency. The efficiency of the prediction methods depended upon the vibration axis and frequency and the direction from the axis of rotation. The level of vibration producing discomfort caused by rotational vibration of subjects seated away from the axis of rotation (i.e., with combined single-axis motions) was adequately predicted by the most severe single-axis component of the motion and by the root-mean-square of the equivalent levels of the combined-axis motions. The most severe component alone method provided the best prediction procedure for many vibration conditions.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The effects of vibration frequency and d
✍ E.M. Whitham; M.J. Griffin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1978 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 611 KB

Although much research has been devoted to the determination of equivalent comfort contours for human response to whole-body vibration little consideration has been given to the source of the feelings that give rise to such comfort contours. This paper shows that for vertical vibration there is a di

EFFECT OF MAGNITUDE OF VERTICAL WHOLE-BO
✍ N.J. Mansfield; M.J. Griffin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 211 KB

The power absorbed by 12 male subjects during exposure to vertical whole-body vibration at six magnitudes of random vibration (0β€’25, 0β€’5, 1β€’0, 1β€’5, 2β€’0 and 2β€’5 ms -2 r.m.s.) has been measured in the laboratory. All subjects showed greatest absorbed power at about 5 Hz, but the frequency of this peak

The Effect of Phase of Differential Vert
✍ H.-K. Jang; J.M. Griffin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 142 KB

This experiment investigated whether the discomfort of seated subjects exposed to vertical vibration was inΒ―uenced by the relative phase between vibration at the seat and the feet. Twelve seated subjects were exposed to sinusoidal 4 Hz vibration by means of two vibrators, one under the seat and the

Effects of frequency, magnitude, damping
✍ Se-Jin Ahn; Michael J. Griffin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 422 KB

The discomfort of seated subjects exposed to a wide range of vertical mechanical shocks has been studied experimentally. Shocks were produced from responses of single degree-of-freedom models with 16 fundamental frequencies (0.5-16 Hz) and four damping ratios (0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4) to half-sine fo