𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The dimer bis(μ-8-hydroxy-7-iodo­quinoline-5-sulfonato-κ3N,O:O′)­bis­[tri­aqua­magnesium(II)] tetrahydrate

✍ Scribed by Francis, Savarimuthu ;Muthiah, Packianathan Thomas ;Rychlewska, Urszula ;Warżajtis, Beata

Publisher
International Union of Crystallography
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
650 KB
Volume
60
Category
Article
ISSN
1600-5368

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Bis(μ-8-hydroxy-7-iodo­quinoline-5-sulfo
Bis(μ-8-hydroxy-7-iodo­quinoline-5-sulfonato-κ3N,O:O′)­bis­[tri­aqua­zinc(II)] tetrahydrate
✍ Francis, Savarimuthu ;Muthiah, Packianathan Thomas ;Bocelli, Gabriele ;Cantoni, 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 International Union of Crystallography 🌐 English ⚖ 462 KB

In the title compound, [Zn 2 (C 9 H 4 INO 4 S) 2 (H 2 O) 6 ]Á4H 2 O, the coordination geometry around the Zn II atom is a distorted octahedron, formed by three water molecules, the N and deprotonated O atoms of the quinolinol ring and one of the O atoms of the sulfonate group. In the centrosymmetric

Polymeric di­aqua(μ-8-hydroxy-7-iodo­qui
Polymeric di­aqua(μ-8-hydroxy-7-iodo­quinoline-5-sulfonato-κ4N,O,O′,O′′)copper(II) tetrahydrate
✍ Francis, Savarimuthu ;Muthiah, Packianathan Thomas ;Bocelli, Gabriele ;Cantoni, 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 International Union of Crystallography 🌐 English ⚖ 311 KB

Single-crystal X-ray study T = 293 K Mean '(C±C) = 0.005 A Ê R factor = 0.041 wR factor = 0.090 Data-to-parameter ratio = 17.4 For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

The interplay of coordination, π–π stack
The interplay of coordination, π–π stacking and hydrogen bonding in the supramolecular self-assembly of bis(μ-7-iodo-8-hydroxy­quinoline-5-sulfonato-κ3N,O:O′)­bis­[tri­aqua­nickel(II)] tetrahydrate
✍ Raj, Savarimuthu Baskar ;Muthiah, Packianathan Thomas ;Rychlewska, Urszula ;Warż 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 International Union of Crystallography 🌐 English ⚖ 246 KB

Single-crystal X-ray study T = 120 K Mean '(C±C) = 0.005 A Ê R factor = 0.026 wR factor = 0.095 Data-to-parameter ratio = 11.1 For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.