𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The correction factors do help in improving the prediction of human clearance from animal data

✍ Scribed by Iftekhar Mahmood


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
74 KB
Volume
94
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-3549

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Prediction of human drug clearance from
✍ Iftekhar Mahmood πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 145 KB

The objective of this study is to evaluate the predictive performance of the rule of exponents (ROE) and 'fu Corrected Intercept Method' (FCIM) for the human drug clearance. Different classes of drugs such as extensively metabolized, renally excreted, renally secreted, and biliary excreted drugs wer

Predicting the hepatic clearance of xeno
✍ Betty-Ann Hoener πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 449 KB

Values for V,, and K, determined during the in vitro metabolism of a xenobiotic to a known metabolite by a specific human isozyme of cytochrome P450 (P450) were used to predict the hepatic clearance (CLH) of the xenobiotic to that metabolite. The calculated CLH values were then compared to literatur

A comprehensive analysis of the role of
✍ Rakesh Nagilla; Keith W. Ward πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 229 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

This study was conducted to comprehensively evaluate the performance of various allometric scaling methods for the prediction of human clearance. Allometric scaling was used to predict clearance for 103 compounds, for which clearance data in the rat, dog, monkey, and humans were available. Allometry

Erratum: A comprehensive analysis of the
✍ Rakesh Nagilla; Keith W. Ward πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 40 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

In Table 3, the MAE value for three-species allometric scaling using the rule of exponents should be 6.44, not 11.03 as originally cited. This error resulted from an incorrect predicted value for one of the 103 compounds in the dataset (nicotine; incorrect error of 479.6 mL/min/kg rather than the co