๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The contribution of the Open University to innovation in higher education

โœ Scribed by G. D. Moss; A. Brew


Publisher
Springer
Year
1981
Tongue
English
Weight
666 KB
Volume
10
Category
Article
ISSN
0018-1560

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The problems involved in the effective dissemination of information and ideas concerning teaching in higher education are discussed. The contribution made by the operation, of the Open University is considered in this context.

The results of a study investigating the influence the Open University has on teaching staff in other institutions in higher education are reported and discussed. The teacher in higher education who is also a part-time staff member of the Open University is seen to be considerably influenced by the Open University. The influence of the Open University is attributed to the accessibility of its materials and its tendency to adopt the characteristics of curriculum innovation identified by the Nuffield researchers.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Innovation in higher education: Implicat
โœ Susan C. White; Theodore S. Glickman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons โš– 72 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract This chapter, drawing from the previous chapters, synthesizes potential directions and implications of future innovation in higher education. The focus is on innovation to address critical issues that administrators face today: the adaptability, maturity, cost structure, and efficiency

Application of the Baldrige model for in
โœ Julie A. Furst-Bowe; Roy A. Bauer ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons โš– 77 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Abstract The Malcolm Baldrige Quality guideposts provide a comprehensive model for systematic quality improvement and innovation in colleges and universities.

The University Grants Committee on the t
โœ Robert O. Berdahl ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1973 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 183 KB

The paper contrasted the golden era of university-state relations from 1919 to 1962 when the University Grants Committee (UGC)was regarded as an ideal neutral buffer and its informal modes of procedure were widely praised, with events of the past ten years when events emanating from both the state a