The contingent valuation method—appraising the appraisers
✍ Scribed by Magnus Johannesson
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 276 KB
- Volume
- 2
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1057-9230
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Morrison & Gyldmark (MG)' in a recent issue of health economics reviewed the use of the contingent valuation (CV) method of measuring willingness to pay in the health area. Although it is useful to examine the appropriate role of the CV method in the health care field, the appraisal by MG has a number of limitations which are pointed out in this paper. These relate to some inaccuracies in the review of the literature, the limited nature of the criteria proposed by MG to evaluate CV studies, and finally I argue that the comparison between CV, QALYs, and HYEs is premature and confuses rather than clarifies the debate.
KEY woms-Contingent valuation, willingness to pay, health state valuations.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
This paper reviews the guidelines and recommendations propounded by Morrison and Gyldmark in relation to the use of contingent valuation (CV) to value health states. The issues raised are: that QALYs may not be sufficiently sensitive to changes in health thus requiring the use of CV formulation; the
## Abstract This paper reports the results of the application of the contingent valuation method (CVM) to determine a monetary value of informal care. We discuss the current practice in valuing informal care and a theoretical model of the costs and benefits related to the provision of informal care