๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The cheapest deliverable bond for the cbt treasury bond futures contract

โœ Scribed by Miles Livingston


Book ID
102842767
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1984
Tongue
English
Weight
630 KB
Volume
4
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-7314

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


ommodity futures contracts have frequently allowed multiple varieties of a C commodity to be delivered . In some cases, there are objective measures of the differences in the varieties deliverable. In other cases, the exchange sets up a formula for value in delivery. These formulas may penalize some varieties of the commodity and make one variety cheapest to deliver.

The Chicago Board of Trade Treasury Bond futures contract allows for delivery of bonds with at least 15 years to call and 15 years to maturity. The value of a bond in delivery is determined by a rule which is called factor pricing (to be explained in detail below). Under factor pricing the cheapest deliverable bond will depend upon bond coupon level, maturity, and upon the term structure of interest rates. This article analyzes the impact of these factors upon the cheapest deliverable bond.

First, this article shows that the cheapest deliverable bond for the CBT Treasury Bond futures contract will be the bond with the smallest ratio of bond price divided by adjustment factor. This cheapest bond will have the lowest cost per unit of value in delivery.

Secondly, this article shows that higher coupon bonds will be better to deliver if bond yields to maturity are 8% or higher, as long as coupon effects are positive (i.e., higher coupon bonds have higher yields). Since positive coupon effects are widely observed in practice, higher coupon bonds will generally be better to deliver. This conclusion is far stronger than , who showed for a neutral coupon effect that lower coupon bonds will be better to deliver, and suggested that a positive coupon will tend to introduce a bias towards higher coupon bonds. The current results show that this bias is an overwhelming effect.

Thirdly, the article examines the impact of bond maturity upon the cheapest deliverable bond. The article considers zero-coupon, discount, par, and premium bonds. For discount bonds, the longest maturity bond is shown to be best to deliver, as long as the bond coupon is 8% or greater and the yield curve is flat or rising. In other cases, short, intermediate, or long maturity bonds may be best to deliver. These results contrast sharply with , who claimed that the long-


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Does the treasury bond futures market de
โœ Gary A. Bortz ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 846 KB

## Futures Market Destabilize the Treasury Bond Cash Market? Gary A. Bortz I. INTRODUCTION everal market professionals and economists have suggested that financial fu-S tures markets may be contributing to the volatility of interest rates. The most prevalent argument is that futures markets are i

Treasury bond futures: Valuing the deliv
โœ Marcelle Arak; Laurie S. Goodman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1987 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 932 KB

wning a security with a guaranteed future sale price and date is (almost) 0 equivalent to a short-term investment extending to the sale date. Yet, in the Treasury bond futures market the prices seem too low to provide a fair rate of return to those who short T-bond futures. That is, the short term i

Risk premiums in financial futures marke
โœ Mark S. Rzepczynski ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1987 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 634 KB

More specifically, futures prices may influence storage and inventory decisions and may exact an important influence on production decisions. This is their price discovery function. Futures markets are seen as an efficient collector, processor, and disseminator of information. 'The large number of