๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The cervical cancer screening program in Mexico: problems with access and coverage

โœ Scribed by E. C. Lazcano-Ponce; P. Najera-Aguilar; E. Buiatti; P. Alonso-de-Ruiz; P. Kuri; L. Cantoral; M. Hernandez-Avila

Book ID
110371566
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
136 KB
Volume
8
Category
Article
ISSN
0957-5243

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Access, access, access : Cervical cancer
Access, access, access : Cervical cancer screening and management practices among providers in the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program (NBCCEDP)
โœ Andrea Milbourne ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 41 KB

Cervical cancer remains a significant problem in the U.S., with approximately 10,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Low income and low socioeconomic status appear to be strong risk factors for developing cervical cancer. In this issue of __Cancer__, Saraiya and colleagues report the results of a 2004

Cervical cancer screening and management
Cervical cancer screening and management practices among providers in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP)
โœ Mona Saraiya; Kathleen L. Irwin; Linda Carlin; Xiao Chen; Nidhi Jain; Vicki Bena ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 166 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. This study was conducted to describe clinicians serving women in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) with regard to demographic and practice characteristics and their usual practices in cervical cancer screening and abnormal cytology

Monitoring a national cancer prevention
Monitoring a national cancer prevention program: Successful changes in cervical cancer screening in the netherlands
โœ Matejka Rebolj; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Louise-Maria Berkers; Dik Habbema ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ French โš– 95 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract The success of screening, an important cancer prevention tool, depends on the quality and efficiency of protocols and guidelines for screening and followโ€up. However, even centrally organized screening programs such as the Dutch cervical screening program occasionally show problems in p