## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. This study was conducted to describe clinicians serving women in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) with regard to demographic and practice characteristics and their usual practices in cervical cancer screening and abnormal cytology
Monitoring a national cancer prevention program: Successful changes in cervical cancer screening in the netherlands
✍ Scribed by Matejka Rebolj; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Louise-Maria Berkers; Dik Habbema
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- French
- Weight
- 95 KB
- Volume
- 120
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7136
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The success of screening, an important cancer prevention tool, depends on the quality and efficiency of protocols and guidelines for screening and follow‐up. However, even centrally organized screening programs such as the Dutch cervical screening program occasionally show problems in performance. To improve this program, the screening scheme, follow‐up, administration and financing protocols and guidelines were thoroughly changed in 1996. This study evaluates the consequences for the performance of the national program. Five‐year coverage rate, the proportion of screened women sent to follow‐up, follow‐up compliance and duration, and the yearly number of Pap smears before and after the changes in 1996 were compared. Five‐year coverage increased substantially in the added target age groups (30–34, and 54–60 years); in the old target age group (35–53 years) it remained around 80%. The percentage of screened women sent to follow‐up decreased from almost 19–3% per screening round, due to a more restrictive use of the Pap 2 classification, and an evidence‐based cessation of follow‐up of negative smears without endocervical cells. Follow‐up compliance has improved, and the average time until a woman is either referred or rejoins the regular screening schedule, has become shorter. The total number of smears, a strong determinant of screening costs, has decreased by 20% primarily due to the changed follow‐up recommendations. In conclusion, the 1996 changes in protocols and guidelines, and their implementation have increased coverage and efficiency, and decreased the screening‐induced negative side effects. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract With respect to cervical cancer management, Finland and the Netherlands are comparable in relevant characteristics, __e.g__., fertility rate, age‐of‐mother at first birth and a national screening programme for several years. The aim of this study is to compare trends in incidence of and
Cervical cancer remains a significant problem in the U.S., with approximately 10,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Low income and low socioeconomic status appear to be strong risk factors for developing cervical cancer. In this issue of __Cancer__, Saraiya and colleagues report the results of a 2004
## Abstract Recommendations for the age to initiate cervical cancer screening should be directed towards maximum detection of early cervical cancer. However, the screening programme should do more good than harm. The aim of this analysis was to determine whether the target age for cervical cancer s