𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The application accuracy of the NeuroMate robot—A quantitative comparison with frameless and frame-based surgical localization systems

✍ Scribed by Qing Hang Li; Lucía Zamorano; Abhilash Pandya; Ramiro Perez; Jianxing Gong; Fernando Diaz


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
723 KB
Volume
7
Category
Article
ISSN
1092-9088

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The NeuroMatetrade mark robot system (Integrated Surgical Systems, Davis, CA) is a commercially available, image-guided, robotic-assisted system used for stereotactic procedures in neurosurgery. In this article, we present a quantitative comparison of the application accuracy of the NeuroMate with that of standard frame-based and frameless stereotactic techniques. The article discusses a five-way application accuracy comparison study. The variables of our comparison and their mean errors are as follows: (1) with the robot in a frame-based configuration, the RMS was 0.86 +/- 0.32 mm; (2) with the robot in the frameless configuration, the RMS was 1.95 +/- 0.44 mm; (3) in a standard stereotactic (ZD) frame-based approach, the RMS was 1.17 +/- 0.25 mm; (4) with an infrared tracking system using the frame for fiducial registration, the RMS was 1.47 +/- 0.45 mm; (5) with an infrared tracking system using screw markers for registration, the RMS was 0.68 +/- 0.26 mm. The study was performed with 2-mm sections of CT scans. These results show that the application accuracy of the frame-based NeuroMate robot is comparable to that of standard localizing systems, whether they are frame-based or infrared tracked.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Effect of optical digitizer selection on
✍ Qinghang Li; Lucia Zamorano; Zhaowei Jiang; Jian Xing Gong; Abhilash Pandya; Ram 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 237 KB 👁 2 views

Application accuracy is a crucial factor for stereotactic surgical localization systems, in which space digitization camera systems are one of the most critical components. In this study we compared the effect of the OPTOTRAK 3020 space digitization system and the FlashPoint Model 3000 and 5000 3D d