Effect of optical digitizer selection on the application accuracy of a surgical localization system—a quantitative comparison between the OPTOTRAK and flashpoint tracking systems
✍ Scribed by Qinghang Li; Lucia Zamorano; Zhaowei Jiang; Jian Xing Gong; Abhilash Pandya; Ramiro Perez; Fernando Diaz
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 237 KB
- Volume
- 4
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1092-9088
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Application accuracy is a crucial factor for stereotactic surgical localization systems, in which space digitization camera systems are one of the most critical components. In this study we compared the effect of the OPTOTRAK 3020 space digitization system and the FlashPoint Model 3000 and 5000 3D digitizer systems on the application accuracy for interactive localization of intracranial lesions. A phantom was mounted with several implantable frameless markers which were randomly distributed on its surface. The target point was digitized and the coordinates were recorded and compared with reference points. The differences from the reference points represented the deviation from the "true point." The root mean square (RMS) was calculated to show the differences, and a paired t-test was used to analyze the results. The results with the phantom showed that, for 1-mm sections of CT scans, the RMS was 0.76 ؎ 0.54 mm for the OPTOTRAK system, 1.23 ؎ 0.53 mm for the FlashPoint Model 3000 3D digitizer system, and 1.00 ؎ 0.42 mm for the FlashPoint Model 5000 system. These preliminary results showed that there is no significant difference between the three tracking systems, and, from the quality point of view, they can all be used for image-guided surgery procedures.