The role of individual differences versus situations has been debated throughout the history of organizational behavior research. Disposition researchers have argued that job satisfaction is to a great extent a product of personality, as individuals vary in their responses to the same situation. Oth
The (affective) dispositional approach to job satisfaction: sorting out the policy implications
โ Scribed by Barry Gerhart
- Book ID
- 102387974
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 137 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3796
- DOI
- 10.1002/job.298
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The dispositional approach to job attitudes has played an important role in refocusing attention in organizational behavior on person factors, in addition to situational factors, as determinants of job attitudes and behaviors. I focus on what have been suggested as policy implications of research on dispositions, in particular, research on affective dispositions. My reading of the evidence suggests that affective dispositional factors may be useful in employee selection, and I identify questions that need to be resolved for this case to be stronger. On the other hand, I find little in the way of logic or evidence to support the claim that dispositions constrain the success of situational interventions designed to improve employee attitudes (or behaviors). Consistent with recent developments in the personality literature and with arguments made by Gerhart and Davis-Blake and Pfeffer in the organizational behavior literature, I show that within-person consistency in attitudes and behaviors can coexist with mean level changes in attitudes and behaviors induced by situational changes in the workplace.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
This paper readdresses the person-situation debate in organizational research. The wellknown arguments of Davis-Blake and Pfeffer (1989) are evaluated in light of research and theory that has transpired since the publication of their original critique. A new dispositional model of job satisfaction i