INTEl',NATI ( )Nil I, 13SH II%ITION, l3ltUSS 1518, 1010.
CHEAllCilL TI{ ADES NXHl BIT.
Tlic systciii clcvisctl for csliiliitiiig cliriiiiciil Iirodiicts iit St. 1,oiiia iii 1!)0J, will Iic follo\rctl nt I%riisscls ; i t oiinblos cvcry csliibitor to sro iii liis o w roiiiitry. iiiitl licforcliniitl, how tlic gootls will Iin sIio\vii ; i t siiliplic~s liiiii witli evidence tlint t h y nrc YO HIIO\VII ; niitl will relieve liiiii of nll rcslionsiliility for tlirir trnnsliort, iiistnllnt ion, niid j~rcsciitntioii to tlic jury of iiwnrtls. This will be clone for n coiii1iiirntivcly siiinll ntltlitioii / J ~O rdct to tlic jiciicrol clinrgc for slincr (see tliis J., Jiily 16, 1D09, 1). Wl). Tlic nictliotl of iiistnllntion nt St. Louis \vns ns follows :-So hrr, tlicii, is R pioncering nct,ioii of siilpliurio acid 1 frihi being n iieccssnry firctor in tlio protiuctioii of cclliilosc iiitrnto, tlint any action of tliis iintiirc toiids to form R cliffurciit conipoiintl, of inferior stirbilit.y, end, moreover, lo\r.c:z tlio yioltl obtninecl.
" 111 reply to Dr. Robortsoii's rornibrks 03 to tlio rclirtivo riitw of cjtcrilicntiori of nitric ireid itrid siilpliiiric iicitlp, wu woiiltl p i n t . out tlint, ibs HIIO~II in Tirblc I.. ib rcry siiinll proportion of nitric ncicl iii tlic iiitnbting inistiire IS siificiont to rctirrtl mil lirrgoly to Iirovciit esterificetion by