𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Thalidomide therapy in adult patients with myelodysplastic syndrome : A North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase II trial

✍ Scribed by Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia; Gerardo Colon-Otero; Antje Hoering; Ayalew Tefferi; Robert D. Niedringhaus; Allen Vukov; Chin-Yang Li; David M. Menke; Susan M. Geyer; Steven R. Alberts; For the North Central Cancer Treatment Group


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
91 KB
Volume
107
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND.

Thalidomide has shown promise for the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. The current prospective multicenter study examined the efficacy and toxicity of thalidomide in adult patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.

METHODS.

Using the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), patients were stratified into 2 groups: favorable (IPSS score, 0–1.0) or unfavorable (IPSS score, 1.5–3.5). Seventy‐two patients (42 of whom were favorable and 30 of whom were unfavorable) received a starting dose of oral thalidomide of 200 mg daily. The dose was increased by 50 mg per week to a targeted maximum daily dose of 1000 mg.

RESULTS.

According to the International Working Group response criteria for myelodysplastic syndrome, 1 patient in the unfavorable group achieved a partial remission with a complete cytogenetic response. Overall, 2 patients (5%) in the favorable group and 4 patients (14%) in the unfavorable group experienced either a hematologic improvement or a partial response. The most frequent Grade 3 or 4 (grading was based on the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0]) nonhematologic adverse events were fatigue (24%), infection (19%), neuropathy (13%), dyspnea (8%), and constipation (7%).

CONCLUSIONS.

Thalidomide alone, at the schedule and dose levels used in the current study, is not a safe and viable therapeutic option for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Limited efficacy and increased toxicity were observed in the current Phase II trial. Cancer 2006. Β© 2006 American Cancer Society.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Evaluation of shark cartilage in patient
✍ Charles L. Loprinzi; Ralph Levitt; Debra L. Barton; Jeff A. Sloan; Pam J. Athert πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 124 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Shark cartilage has been a popular complementary or alternative medicine intervention. The basis for this popularity is the claim that sharks rarely get cancer because of the high proportion of cartilage in the shark's body. However, early studies were equivocal. Therefor