Tax-loss carryforward and futures hedging
β Scribed by Donald Lien; Michael Metz
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 139 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0143-6570
- DOI
- 10.1002/mde.1089
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Our research is motivated by the Corn Products vs Arkansas Best Supreme court decisions that brought on the controversy of the tax treatment of gains and losses from futures hedging. The usefulness of a futures contract as risk management tool depends on the tax code. In this paper we address implications of capital treatment of futures positions (disallowing offset for tax purposes) when taxβloss carryover is allowed. Our analysis utilizes a twoβperiod model to capture the interβtemporal effects. We investigate the optimal hedge ratios under these scenarios analytically where possible, and numerically where necessary. Copyright Β© 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This paper examines the optimal futures hedging decision of a firm facing uncertain income that is subject to asymmetric taxation with no loss-offset provisions. All futures contracts are marked to market and require interim cash settlement of gains and losses. The firm is liquidity constrained in t
## Abstract This note examines the effect of loss aversion on the futures trading behavior of a short hedger. Using a modified constantβabsoluteβriskβaversion utility function, I show that loss aversion has no effect in an unbiased futures market. It has different, predictable impacts when the futu
This paper examines the optimal bidding and hedging decisions of a risk-averse firm that takes part in an international tender. The firm faces multiple sources of uncertainty: exchange rate risk, risk of an unsuccessful tender, and business risk. The firm is allowed to trade unbiased currency future