๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

International tenders and futures hedging

โœ Scribed by Donald Lien; Kit Pong Wong


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
139 KB
Volume
27
Category
Article
ISSN
0143-6570

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This paper examines the optimal bidding and hedging decisions of a risk-averse firm that takes part in an international tender. The firm faces multiple sources of uncertainty: exchange rate risk, risk of an unsuccessful tender, and business risk. The firm is allowed to trade unbiased currency futures contracts to imperfectly hedge its contingent foreign exchange risk exposure. We show that the firm shorts less (more) of the unbiased futures contracts when its marginal utility function is convex (concave) as compared with the case that the marginal utility function is linear. We further show that the curvature of the marginal utility function plays a decisive role in determining the impact of currency futures hedging on the firm's bidding behavior. Sufficient conditions that ensure the firm bids more or less aggressively than in the case without hedging opportunities are derived.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Liquidity and hedging effectiveness unde
โœ A. Andani; J. A. Lafuente; A. Novales ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 165 KB

## Abstract We analyze the hedging effectiveness of positions that replicate stock indexes using corresponding futures contracts through the application of a dynamic, stochastic hedging strategy proposed by Lafuente, J. A. and Novales, A. (2003). Conclusive gains do not emerge in any of the markets

Corporate taxes and hedging with futures
โœ T. Hanan Eytan ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1990 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 382 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views
Tax-loss carryforward and futures hedgin
โœ Donald Lien; Michael Metz ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 139 KB

## Abstract Our research is motivated by the Corn Products vs Arkansas Best Supreme court decisions that brought on the controversy of the tax treatment of gains and losses from futures hedging. The usefulness of a futures contract as risk management tool depends on the tax code. In this paper we a

Futures Hedging Under Disappointment Ave
โœ Donald Lien ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 111 KB

## Abstract This article considers optimal futures hedging decisions when the hedger is disappointmentโ€averse (Gul, 1991). When the futures contract is a perfect hedge instrument, a disappointmentโ€averse hedger always holds a position closer to the full hedge than a nondisappointmentโ€averse hedger.