𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Systematic error and comparison of four methods for assessing the viability ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaesuspensions

✍ Scribed by H. Lange; J. M. Bavouzet; P. Taillandier; C. Delorme

Book ID
110557962
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Year
1993
Tongue
English
Weight
256 KB
Volume
7
Category
Article
ISSN
0951-208X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

A comparison of four methods for assessi
A comparison of four methods for assessing natural helping ability
✍ Jessica V. Stahl; Clara E. Hill πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 128 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract The current study was designed to compare four possible methods of identifying natural helpers: a self‐report measure of natural helping ability, ratings by others of helping ability based on two 10‐minute helping sessions, self‐report on measures assessing theoretically‐derived constru