𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A comparison of four methods for assessing natural helping ability

✍ Scribed by Jessica V. Stahl; Clara E. Hill

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
128 KB
Volume
36
Category
Article
ISSN
0090-4392

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

The current study was designed to compare four possible methods of identifying natural helpers: a self‐report measure of natural helping ability, ratings by others of helping ability based on two 10‐minute helping sessions, self‐report on measures assessing theoretically‐derived constructs related to natural helping, and a self‐report of intent to pursue a helping career. On the basis of a correlational analysis, we found the most support for the self‐report measure of natural helping ability and intent to pursue a helping career. Implications for research and training are provided. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Confidence Intervals for Cost–Effectiven
Confidence Intervals for Cost–Effectiveness Ratios: A Comparison of Four Methods
✍ Daniel Polsky; Henry A. Glick; Richard Willke; Kevin Schulman 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 90 KB 👁 2 views

We evaluated four methods for computing confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios developed from randomized controlled trials: the box method, the Taylor series method, the nonparametric bootstrap method and the Fieller theorem method. We performed a Monte Carlo experiment to compare these

Web citation data for impact assessment:
Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines
✍ Liwen Vaughan; Debora Shaw 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 117 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract The number and type of Web citations to journal articles in four areas of science are examined: biology, genetics, medicine, and multidisciplinary sciences. For a sample of 5,972 articles published in 114 journals, the median Web citation counts per journal article range from 6.2 in med

Comparison of four methods for the estim
Comparison of four methods for the estimation of intracranial volume: A gold standard study
✍ B. Sahin; N. Acer; O.F. Sonmez; M. Emirzeoglu; H. Basaloglu; A. Uzun; S. Bilgic 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 198 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract Investigators can infer how much reduction in volume has occurred since brain volume was at its peak, by combining measures of brain volume with measures of intracranial volume (ICV). Several methodologies have been proposed to asses the ICV. However, we have not seen a gold‐standard st