## Abstract A liquid chromatographic‐electrospray ionization‐tandem mass spectrometric method for the quantification of the opiates morphine, codeine, and their metabolites morphine‐3‐β‐D‐glucuronide (M‐3‐G), morphine‐6‐β‐D‐glucuronide (M‐6‐G) and codeine‐6‐β‐D‐glucuronide (C‐6‐G) in human urine ha
Synthesis and bioanalytical evaluation of morphine-3-O-sulfate and morphine-6-O-sulfate in human urine and plasma using LC-MS/MS
✍ Scribed by Maria Andersson; Tomasz Janosik; Hamid Shirani; Johnny Slätt; Andreas Fischer; Olof Beck
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2012
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 287 KB
- Volume
- 35
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1615-9306
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The aim of this work was to synthesize morphine‐3‐O‐sulfate and morphine‐6‐O‐sulfate for use as reference substances, and to determine the sulfate conjugates as possible heroin and morphine metabolites in plasma and urine by a validated LC‐MS/MS method. Morphine‐6‐O‐sulfate and morphine‐3‐O‐sulfate were prepared as dihydrates from morphine hydrochloride, in overall yields of 41 and 39% with product purities of >99.5% and >98%, respectively. For bioanalysis, the chromatographic system consisted of a reversed‐phase column and gradient elution. The tandem mass spectrometer was operated in the positive electrospray mode using selected reaction monitoring, of transition m/z 366.15 to 286.40. The measuring range was 5–500 ng/mL for morphine‐3‐O‐sulfate and 4.5–454 ng/mL for morphine‐6‐O‐sulfate in plasma. In urine, the measuring range was 50–5000 ng/mL for morphine‐3‐O‐sulfate and 45.4–4544 ng/mL for morphine‐6‐O‐sulfate. The intra‐assay and total imprecision (coefficient of variation) was below 11% for both analytes in urine and plasma. Quantifiable levels of morphine‐3‐O‐sulfate in authentic urine and plasma samples were found. Only one authentic urine sample contained a detectable level of morphine‐6‐O‐sulfate, while no detectable morphine‐6‐O‐sulfate was found in plasma samples.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The original article to which this Erratum refers was published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry 40, 2005, 1412–1416. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd