Syntheses and Comparison of 2,6-Di-O-methyl Celluloses from Natural and Synthetic Celluloses
✍ Scribed by Hiroshi Kamitakahara; Andreas Koschella; Yuji Mikawa; Fumiaki Nakatsubo; Thomas Heinze; Dieter Klemm
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 286 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1616-5187
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
2,6‐Di‐O‐methylcellulose was prepared from natural and synthetic celluloses. Natural cellulose was converted to 2,6‐di‐O‐thexyldimethylsilylcellulose, then to 3‐mono‐O‐allyl‐2,6‐di‐O‐methylcellulose, and finally into 2,6‐di‐O‐methylcellulose. Alternatively, 2,6 di‐O‐methylcellulose was synthesized from the synthetic cellulose derivative 3‐mono‐O‐benzyl‐2,6‐di‐O‐pivaloylcellulose by depivaloylation and methylation to give 3‐mono‐O‐benzyl‐2,6‐di‐O‐methylcellulose, which was debenzylated to yield the dimethyl ether. Both types of 2,6‐di‐O‐methylcellulose are insoluble in water and common organic solvents. The structures of all cellulose derivatives were determined by NMR.
magnified image
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES