## Abstract ## Background The association between nodal ratio and survival has not been assessed in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. ## Methods This is a population‐based analysis, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End‐Results database, to determine whether nodal ratio impa
Survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity : Differences between pT4 N0 and other stage IVA categories
✍ Scribed by Chun-Ta Liao; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Hung-Ming Wang; Shu-Hang Ng; Chuen Hsueh; Li-Yu Lee; Chih-Hung Lin; I-How Chen; Shiang-Fu Huang; Ann-Joy Cheng; Tzu-Chen Yen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 103 KB
- Volume
- 110
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND.
According to the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC, 5^th^ edition) classification system, pT4 N0 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) qualifies for stage IVA status, with its implied poor prognosis. However, preliminary observations suggested that patients with pT4 N0 OSCC might have better survival than other stage IVA categories. The authors sought to identify accurate prognosticators in patients with stage III/IVA OSCC.
METHODS.
The authors retrospectively reviewed 513 consecutive patients with stage III/IVA OSCC who were undergoing radical surgery. Survival was plotted by Kaplan‐Meier analysis.
RESULTS.
One hundred seventy‐eight patients were in stage III, and 335 were in stage IVA. The 335 stage IVA patients were divided into pT4 N0 (n = 105) and pT4 N1/TAny N2 (NO pT4 N0 M0, n = 230). By univariate analysis, 5‐year neck control rates (P < .0001), distant metastases (P < .0001), disease‐free survival rates (P < .0001), and overall survival rates (P < .0001) were significantly different in pT4 N0 compared with NO pT4 N0 patients. No significant difference in survival between pT4 N0 stage IVA and pstage III could be shown. Multivariate analysis for overall survival demonstrated that the following factors were independently associated with pT4 N0: tumor depth ≥35 mm, vessel invasion, lymph invasion, and perineural invasion. In contrast, tumor depth ≥25 mm, treatment with surgery alone, poor differentiation, extracapsular spread, and pathological nodal metastases (≥8 lymph nodes) were independent predictors of overall survival in NO pT4 N0.
CONCLUSIONS.
In patients with stage IVA OSCC (AJCC, 1997), the survival rates for pT4 N0 are better than those for NO pT4 N0 and similar to those of patients with pstage III. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Background The association between nodal ratio and survival in oral cavity carcinomas has recently been proposed, but no prospective evaluations exist. ## Methods We sought to determine, using an institutional database, whether nodal ratio impacts survival in node‐positive oral ca
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The current randomized, multicenter, Phase III trial was conducted to determine whether the disease free interval and overall survival of patients with T2–T4,N0–N3,M0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity or oropharynx could be extended through the combination
## Abstract ## Background Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been proposed for staging of the cN0 neck in early oral/oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). Because SNB is a minimally invasive procedure, it is thought to be associated with less morbidity than elective neck dissection. ## Method
## Abstract ## Background Management of the N0 neck in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. We describe the outcome of patients who underwent transoral tumor excision and a wait‐and‐see policy for the neck staged N0 by ultrasonography‐guided cytology (US