Structure–activity relationships of dynorphin analogs substituted in positions 2 and 3

✍ Scribed by Georg Schlechtingen; Robert N. DeHaven; Jeffrey D. Daubert; Joel Cassel; Murray Goodman

• Publisher: Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
• Year: 2003
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 94 KB
• Volume: 71
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0006-3525
• DOI: 10.1002/bip.10382

✦ Synopsis

Following up on the observation that the dynorphin analog [Pro(3)]Dyn A(1-11)-NH(2) 2 possesses high affinity and selectivity for the kappa opioid receptor, a number of related peptides were prepared and characterized by radioligand binding and [(35)S]GTPgammaS assays. While incorporation of 2-azetidine carboxylic acid in position 3 led to the equally potent analog 3, the corresponding analog containing piperidine-2-carboxylic acid showed a nearly 90-fold reduction in kappa affinity. Differential preferred bond angles phi in the three building blocks might account for these observations. Compounds 2 and 3 were kappa antagonists with IC(50) values of 380 and 350 nM, respectively. The Sar(3) analog 7 and the Sar(2) analog 8 were kappa agonists, with greater selectivity than Dyn A(1-11)-NH(2) 1. In view of their high kappa affinities (8: K(i) = 1.5 nM; 2: K(i) = 2.4 nM), the new analogs were surprisingly weak kappa agonists or antagonists, e.g., the EC(50) value for the agonist 8 was 280 nM. Different kappa receptor subtypes in binding vs functional assays can not account for these results, since both assays were performed using the same membrane preparation.