𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Structure of representations with highest weight of infinite-dimensional Lie algebras

✍ Scribed by V.G Kac; D.A Kazhdan


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1979
Tongue
English
Weight
636 KB
Volume
34
Category
Article
ISSN
0001-8708

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Irreducible Representations of Infinite-
✍ P.R. Chernoff πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 999 KB

This paper contains some general results on irreducibility and inequivalence of representations of certain kinds of infinite dimensional Lie algebras, related to transformation groups. The main abstract theorem is a generalization of a classical result of Burnside. Applications are given, especially

Integrating Unitary Representations of I
✍ Valerio Toledano Laredo πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 237 KB

We show that in the presence of suitable commutator estimates, a projective unitary representation of the Lie algebra of a connected and simply connected Lie group G exponentiates to G. Our proof does not assume G to be finite-dimensional or of Banach Lie type and therefore encompasses the diffeomor

Unitary Highest Weight Representations i
✍ Karl-Hermann Neeb; Bent Ørsted πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 506 KB

Automorphism groups of symmetric domains in Hilbert spaces form a natural class of infinite dimensional Lie algebras and corresponding Banach Lie groups. We give a classification of the algebraic category of unitary highest weight modules for such Lie algebras and show that infinite dimensional vers

On the Cohomology of Infinite Dimensiona
✍ A. Fialowski πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 289 KB

In the paper one- and two-dimensional cohomology is compared for finite and infinite nilpotent Lie algebras, with coefficients in the adjoint representation. It turns out that, because the adjoint representation is not a highest weight representation in infinite dimension, the considered cohomology