๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Stock market margin requirements and volatility: Implications for regulation of stock index futures

โœ Scribed by Michael A. Salinger


Publisher
Springer
Year
1989
Tongue
English
Weight
1006 KB
Volume
3
Category
Article
ISSN
0920-8550

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This article reexamines the evidence on the relationship between stock market margin buying and volatility, and discusses the implications for the regulation of futures markets margin requirements. Post-war data provide no evidence of a link between the initial margin requirements set by the Federal Reserve and stock market volatility. Over the entire period in which the Federal Reserve has set margin requirements (1934-present), there is a correlation between margin requirements and margin debt on the one hand and 'volatility on the other. However, margin debt is not primarily associated with downside volatility and margin requirements are not primarily associated with upside volatility, as would be expected if margin buying were the cause of the volatility. Thus, the experience with stock market margin requirements provides no support for regulating futures markets margins in order to curb volatility. While this evidence does not rule out the possibility that margin buying contributed to the speculative boom of the 1920s and the 1929 crash, margin debt represented a much greater fraction of the 1929 stock market than have stock market futures in the 1980s. Even taking the experience of the 1920s into account, therefore, there is still no justification for regulating futures margins in order to curb volatility.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Commentary:Stock market margin requireme
โœ Gikas A. Hardouvelis ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1989 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 636 KB

Michael Salinger has provided a very thoughtful and well-balanced article on margin requirements. The article builds upon and extends some of my earlier work on margin requirements and stock market volatility. Professor Salinger, however, reaches a different conclusion than I did about the influence

Stock market volatility and the forecast
โœ Janchung Wang ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 120 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract This study attempts to apply the general equilibrium model of stock index futures with both stochastic market volatility and stochastic interest rates to the TAIFEX and the SGX Taiwan stock index futures data, and compares the predictive power of the cost of carry and the general equili

Index futures and options and stock mark
โœ Pericli, Andreas; Koutmos, Gregory ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 266 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

This article has benefited from the comments and suggestions of two anonymous reviewers. ## 1 Of course, speculation based on fundamentals is likely to be stabilizing rather than destabilizing. Destabilizing speculation may be the result of noise trading (i.e., buying and selling not on the basis

Market volatility and the demand for hed
โœ Chang, Eric; Chou, Ray Y.; Nelling, Edward F. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 228 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

This study examines the relation between stock market volatility and the demand for hedging in S&P 500 stock index futures contracts. Open interest is used as a proxy for hedging demand. The analysis employs unique data that identify separately the open interest of large hedgers, large speculators,

Stock index futures markets: stochastic
โœ Robert G. Tompkins ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 220 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

This study examined whether the inclusion of an appropriate stochastic volatility that captures key distributional and volatility facets of stock index futures is sufficient to explain implied volatility smiles for options on these markets. I considered two variants of stochastic volatility models r