This study examined whether the inclusion of an appropriate stochastic volatility that captures key distributional and volatility facets of stock index futures is sufficient to explain implied volatility smiles for options on these markets. I considered two variants of stochastic volatility models r
Index futures and options and stock market volatility
โ Scribed by Pericli, Andreas; Koutmos, Gregory
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 266 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-7314
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
This article has benefited from the comments and suggestions of two anonymous reviewers.
1
Of course, speculation based on fundamentals is likely to be stabilizing rather than destabilizing. Destabilizing speculation may be the result of noise trading (i.e., buying and selling not on the basis of fundamentals). Feedback trading strategies also have the effect of increasing market volatility.
2
The huge losses of Procter and Gamble, Orange County Metallgesellschaft, and Barrings, in deals involving derivatives, have created a great deal of controversy [e.g., Miller (1995) and Kuprianov (1995)].
s Andreas Pericli is a Senior Economist with the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
This study examines the relation between stock market volatility and the demand for hedging in S&P 500 stock index futures contracts. Open interest is used as a proxy for hedging demand. The analysis employs unique data that identify separately the open interest of large hedgers, large speculators,
Previous studies have examined causality within and between different spot and futures markets with a motivation to discover market comovements, price leadership effects, and, more recently, volatility spillovers across markets. However, the empirical framework within which this is accomplished tend
This paper explores a number of statistical models for predicting the daily stock return volatility of an aggregate of all stocks traded on the NYSE. An application of linear and non-linear Granger causality tests highlights evidence of bidirectional causality, although the relationship is stronger