𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Statistical methods for haplotype-based matched case-control association studies

✍ Scribed by Han Zhang; Hong Zhang; Zhaohai Li; Gang Zheng


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
157 KB
Volume
31
Category
Article
ISSN
0741-0395

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Kraft et al. [2005] proposed a method for matched haplotype‐based association studies and compared the performances of six analytic strategies for estimating the odds ratio parameters using a conditional likelihood function. Zhang et al. [2006] modified the conditional likelihood and proposed a new method for matched haplotype‐based association studies. The main assumptions of Zhang et al. were that the disease was rare, the population was in Hardy‐Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), and the haplotypes were independent of the covariates and matching variable(s). In this article, we modify the estimation procedure proposed by Zhang et al. and introduce a fixation index so that the assumption of HWE is relaxed. Using the Wald test, we compare the current modified method with the procedure developed by Kraft et al. through simulations. The results show that the modified method is uniformly more powerful than that described in Kraft et al. Furthermore, the results indicate that the modified method is quite robust to the rare disease assumption. Genet. Epidemiol. 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Simple methods for assessing haplotype-e
✍ L.C. Kwee; M.P. Epstein; A.K. Manatunga; R. Duncan; A.S. Allen; G.A. Satten 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 216 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract For investigating haplotype‐environment interactions in case‐control studies, one can implement statistical methods based either on a retrospective likelihood (modeling the probability of haplotype and environment conditional on disease status) or a prospective likelihood (modeling the

A prevalence-based association test for
✍ Kelli K. Ryckman; Lan Jiang; Chun Li; Jacquelaine Bartlett; Jonathan L. Haines; 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 90 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Genetic association is often determined in case‐control studies by the differential distribution of alleles or genotypes. Recent work has demonstrated that association can also be assessed by deviations from the expected distributions of alleles or genotypes. Specifically, multiple meth

Comparison of prospective and retrospect
✍ Glen A. Satten; Michael P. Epstein 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 128 KB

## Abstract We compare bias and power of three methods for haplotype inference on disease risk using unphased genotype data from a case‐control study. We examine the prospective score test of Schaid et al. ([2002] Am. J. Hum. Genet 70:425–434), a novel modification of the prospective estimating equ

Genotype-based matching to correct for p
✍ Weihua Guan; Liming Liang; Michael Boehnke; Gonçalo R. Abecasis 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 316 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract Genome‐wide association studies are helping to dissect the etiology of complex diseases. Although case‐control association tests are generally more powerful than family‐based association tests, population stratification can lead to spurious disease‐marker association or mask a true asso

Resampling-based multiple hypothesis tes
✍ Bingshu E. Chen; Lori C. Sakoda; Ann W. Hsing; Philip S. Rosenberg 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 265 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract In case‐control studies of unrelated subjects, gene‐based hypothesis tests consider whether any tested feature in a candidate gene—single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), haplotypes, or both—are associated with disease. Standard statistical tests are available that control the false‐pos

A new association test based on Chi-squa
✍ Zhongxue Chen 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 146 KB 👁 1 views

In case-control genetic association studies, the robust procedure, Pearson's Chi-square test, is commonly used for testing association between disease status and genetic markers. However, this test does not take the possible trend of relative risks, which are due to genotype, into account. On the co