𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Simple methods for assessing haplotype-environment interactions in case-only and case-control studies

✍ Scribed by L.C. Kwee; M.P. Epstein; A.K. Manatunga; R. Duncan; A.S. Allen; G.A. Satten


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
216 KB
Volume
31
Category
Article
ISSN
0741-0395

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

For investigating haplotype‐environment interactions in case‐control studies, one can implement statistical methods based either on a retrospective likelihood (modeling the probability of haplotype and environment conditional on disease status) or a prospective likelihood (modeling the probability of disease status conditional on haplotype and environment). Retrospective approaches are generally more powerful than prospective approaches, but require an explicit model of the joint distribution of haplotype and environmental factors in the sample with the latter being particularly unattractive to specify. To resolve this issue, we propose a number of simple retrospective procedures for haplotype‐environment interaction analysis that do not require explicit modeling of environmental covariates in the sample. We first consider a cases‐only procedure, followed by a simple likelihood for case‐control data that is proportional to the full‐retrospective likelihood. Finally, we consider a retrospective procedure for inference on haplotype‐environment interaction effects in matched or finely‐stratified case‐control studies. Our methods are based on the assumptions that haplotypes and environmental covariates are independent in the target population and that disease is rare. We illustrate our approaches using case‐control data from the Finland‐United States Investigation of Non‐Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (FUSION) genetic study and simulated data. Genet. Epidemiol. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Statistical methods for haplotype-based
✍ Han Zhang; Hong Zhang; Zhaohai Li; Gang Zheng 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 157 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Kraft et al. [2005] proposed a method for matched haplotype‐based association studies and compared the performances of six analytic strategies for estimating the odds ratio parameters using a conditional likelihood function. Zhang et al. [2006] modified the conditional likelihood and pr

Comparison of prospective and retrospect
✍ Glen A. Satten; Michael P. Epstein 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 128 KB

## Abstract We compare bias and power of three methods for haplotype inference on disease risk using unphased genotype data from a case‐control study. We examine the prospective score test of Schaid et al. ([2002] Am. J. Hum. Genet 70:425–434), a novel modification of the prospective estimating equ

Evaluation of two methods for assessing
✍ Analee J. Etheredge; Kaare Christensen; Deborah del Junco; Jeffrey C. Murray; La 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 97 KB 👁 3 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Epidemiological investigations have begun to consider gene‐environment (GE) interactions as potential risk factors for many diseases, including several different birth defects. However, traditional methodological approaches for the analysis of case‐control data tend to ha

Potential gain in efficiency and power t
✍ Til Stürmer; Hermann Brenner 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 160 KB 👁 2 views

Background: There is growing interest in interactions between genetic and environmental risk factors of disease, but adequate power to detect such interactions in epidemiologic studies is of concern. The aim of this paper is to quantify the effect of matching on the efficiency of estimation and powe

Exploiting gene-environment independence
✍ Nilanjan Chatterjee; Zeynep Kalaylioglu; Raymond J. Carroll 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 208 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Family‐based case‐control studies are popularly used to study the effect of genes and gene‐environment interactions in the etiology of rare complex diseases. We consider methods for the analysis of such studies under the assumption that genetic susceptibility (__G__) and environmental e