𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Statistical Evaluation of Two Air Samplers and of The activation Analysis of Aerosols

✍ Scribed by R. Heindryckx; R. Dams


Publisher
Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Year
2010
Weight
258 KB
Volume
82
Category
Article
ISSN
0037-9646

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Development and evaluation of a sampling
✍ Sidney P. Tuesley; John J. Sciarra; Anthony J. Monte-Bovi πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1968 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 753 KB

Relative positions of stirrers and dissolution vessels may be adjusted at will. ( e ) Size of samples taken is adjustable. The dissolution behavior of an experimental potassium chloride tablet was used to illustrate the application of this apparatus in comparison with a more laborious single dissol

On two methods of statistical image anal
✍ J. Missimer; U. Knorr; R.P. Maguire; H. Herzog; R.J. Seitz; L. Tellman; K.L. Lee πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 219 KB πŸ‘ 3 views

The computerized brain atlas (CBA) and statistical parametric mapping (SPM) are two procedures for voxel-based statistical evaluation of PET activation studies. Each includes spatial standardization of image volumes, computation of a statistic, and evaluation of its significance. In addition, smooth

Evaluation of sorptive enrichment for th
✍ Bart Tienpont; Frank David; Pat Sandra; Freddy Vanwalleghem πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 136 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Classical methods for sampling and analysis of phthalates in air suffer from low sensitivity and high risk of contamination. A new approach based on enrichment on polydimethylsiloxane sorption tubes followed by thermal desorption Ž . and capillary gas chromatography᎐mass spectroscopy GC᎐MS analysis

EVALUATION OF STATISTICAL MODELS FOR CLE
✍ PEETERS, GEOFFROY ;MARZANO, FRANK SILVIO ;d’AURIA, GIOVANNI ;RIVA, CARLO ;VANHOE πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 356 KB

The objective of this study is to evaluate and to compare some of the statistical models for the monthly prediction of clear-air scintillation variance and amplitude from ground meteorological measurements. Two new statistical methods, namely the direct and the modelled physical-statistical predicti