Static electric field effects at the surface of a metallic cluster
โ Scribed by Michael Hutchinson; Thomas F. George
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1985
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 358 KB
- Volume
- 117
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0009-2614
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
A jell~um/~rce-elcctron model is used lo estimale the static elatric field at the surface of a mctol cluster_ The electric field near a cluster with a radius of lo-50 au is round to deviate signifrcnntly From the field at the snme distance from an infinite metallic plane This will Influence several adsorbate properlies. including bondrng. At a smooth planar surlace the field is suffinently strong IO cause signilicant contributions to the &pole and transition momenk of an admolaule. These contributions become even more important at the surrace ol a cluster. It is postulated that microscopic roughness may enhance the electron-transfer contribution to surface-enhanced Raman scattering. smce the Fenm energy of electrons in a protuberance is mcreascd relative to the bulk Moreover, for the same reason. the molecule-metal interaction is mcreased when the molerule IS adsorbed at a protuberance Finally. by means of a WKB formula derived rrom the model. an accwa~c prediction can bc made of the "magic numbers" whxh reler to the enhanced abundanw or cenan clusw-s when formed in an alornic beam Thererore these numbers are bkcly to be determined by the symmetry of the problem and not by the detailed nature of the one-electron polential.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Mouse astrocytes (glial cells) in primary cultures were exposed to a low-voltage static DC electric field with no current flow and thus with no generation of magnetic fields. The electric field altered the rate of glycolysis, measured by 2-deoxyglucose accumulation. The magnitude and direction of th
We calculate the modifitxtions of the static polarizability of a general system (arom or molecule) induced by a perfect metallic surface. The calculations use the Feynman propagator and take retardation effects into account. For any distance from the mirror the induced polarizability is composed of