๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Staging of carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: A comparison of different staging criteria

โœ Scribed by Dr. F. Henry Ellis Jr.; Elton Watkins Jr.; Mark J. Krasna; Gerald J. Heatley; Karoly Balogh


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1993
Tongue
English
Weight
355 KB
Volume
52
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-4790

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The third edition [1988] of the Manual for Staging of Cancer of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) was developed to permit finer discrimination between stages than was true of the previous edition [ 19831. This study was designed to determine whether or not this goal was achieved. Pathologic staging of the specimens removed from 265 patients with carcinoma of the esophagus or cardia undergoing esophagogastrectomy between 1970 and 1988 was performed according to criteria published in the second and third editions and their survival data compared. The new staging criteria of the AJCC provides no better discrimination of stages according to survival than was true of the earlier version, the 5-year survival of stage IIA patients being similar to that of stage I patients (37.5 ? 6.7% vs. 50.8 k 17.7%), and the survival of stage IIB patients being similar to that of stage I11 patients (16.2 2 8. I % vs. 13.6 2 3.7%).

However, depth of wall penetration and extent of lymph node involvement were reliable independent predictors of survival. We propose a modified version of the Skinner WNM staging plan that provides a modest increase in staging fragmentation.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A comparison of staging systems for naso
โœ Jay S. Cooper; Richard Cohen; Randy E. Stevens ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 110 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## BACKGROUND. The fifth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual defines new rules for classifying nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The authors tested the value of this new system by applying these rules retrospectively to their previously treated patients and comparing the resul

Staging carcinoma of the penis
โœ Burton H. Baker; Frank R. Watson ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1975 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 293 KB

## Abstract Presently there are six clinical staging systems in use for carcinoma of the penis. We propose a method which compares these systems by means of a check list type of format. With the aid of this device, any penile carcinoma can readily be staged in terms of all six systems. Advantages o

A comparison of different staging system
โœ James D. Brierley; Tony Panzarella; Richard W. Tsang; Mary K. Gospodarowicz; Bri ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 166 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

tabulating the numbers of patients within each stage group; 2) collapsing stage stitute/Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ongroupings into high and low risk groups and calculating mortality rates at 10 and tario, Canada. 15 years; 3) summing observed deviations at 5, 10, and 15 years; and 4) cal

Association of prediagnosis endoscopy wi
โœ Gregory S. Cooper; Zhong Yuan; Amitabh Chak; Alfred A. Rimm ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 216 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Barrett esophagus, a consequence of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease, is a premalignant condition for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and, possibly, the gastric cardia. However, the actual use and clinical impact of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in screening and