𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Stages of change

✍ Scribed by John C. Norcross; Paul M. Krebs; James O. Prochaska


Book ID
102307597
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
127 KB
Volume
67
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9762

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The transtheoretical model, in general, and the stages of change, in particular, have proven useful in adapting or tailoring treatment to the individual. We define the stages and processes of change and then review previous meta‐analyses on their interrelationship. We report an original meta‐analysis of 39 studies, encompassing 8,238 psychotherapy patients, to assess the ability of stages of change and related readiness measures to predict psychotherapy outcomes. Clinically significant effect sizes were found for the association between stage of change and psychotherapy outcomes (d = .46); the amount of progress clients make during treatment tends to be a function of their pretreatment stage of change. We examine potential moderators in effect size by study outcome, patient characteristics, treatment features, and diagnosis. We also review the large volume of behavioral health research, but scant psychotherapy research, that demonstrates the efficacy of matching treatment to the patient's stage of change. Limitations of the extant research are noted, and practice recommendations are advanced. Β© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol: In Session 67:143–154, 2011.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Stages of change and prenatal alcohol us
✍ Grace Chang; Tay McNamara; Louise Wilkins-Haug; E. John Orav πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 103 KB
Dietary Applications of the Stages of Ch
✍ GEOFFREY W GREENE; SUSAN R ROSSI; JOSEPH S ROSSI; WAYNE F VELICER; JOSEPH L FAVA πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 642 KB
Processes and Stages of Change: Counseli
✍ John V. Petrocelli πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› American Counseling Association 🌐 English βš– 248 KB

Technical eclecticism and theoretical integration literature has typically examined how multiple approaches to counseling practice may lead to more comprehensive and functional outcomes. Few have proposed an integration of approaches from a scientist‐practitioner perspective; many others have neglec