𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Solubility advantage of amorphous pharmaceuticals: I. A thermodynamic analysis

✍ Scribed by Sharad B. Murdande; Michael J. Pikal; Ravi M. Shanker; Robin H. Bogner


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
211 KB
Volume
99
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-3549

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


In recent years there has been growing interest in advancing amorphous pharmaceuticals as an approach for achieving adequate solubility. Due to difficulties in the experimental measurement of solubility, a reliable estimate of the solubility enhancement ratio of an amorphous form of a drug relative to its crystalline counterpart would be highly useful. We have developed a rigorous thermodynamic approach to estimate enhancement in solubility that can be achieved by conversion of a crystalline form to the amorphous form. We rigorously treat the three factors that contribute to differences in solubility between amorphous and crystalline forms. First, we calculate the free energy difference between amorphous and crystalline forms from thermal properties measured by modulated differential scanning calorimetry (MDSC). Secondly, since an amorphous solute can absorb significant amounts of water, which reduces its activity and solubility, a correction is made using water sorption isotherm data and the Gibbs-Duhem equation. Next, a correction is made for differences in the degree of ionization due to differences in solubilities of the two forms. Utilizing this approach the theoretically estimated solubility enhancement ratio of 7.0 for indomethacin (amorphous/gamma-crystal) was found to be in close agreement with the experimentally determined ratio of 4.9.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Physical stability of amorphous pharmace
✍ Deliang Zhou; Geoff G.Z. Zhang; Devalina Law; David J.W. Grant; Eric A. Schmitt πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 147 KB

This work relates the thermodynamic quantities (Gc, Hc, and Sc) and the molecular mobility values (1/tau) of five structurally diverse amorphous compounds to their crystallization behavior. The model compounds included: ritonavir, ABT-229, fenofibrate, sucrose, and acetaminophen. Modulated temperatu