𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Shortcomings of the current TNM classification for penile carcinoma: time for a change?

✍ Scribed by Joost A. P. Leijte; Simon Horenblas


Book ID
106033263
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
196 KB
Volume
27
Category
Article
ISSN
0724-4983

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A critical look at the TNM classificatio
✍ A. B. M. F. Karim; J. H. Kralendonk; K. H. Njo; J. M. Tabak; G. Gort πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1990 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 458 KB

A total number of 564 patients with glottic (427) and supraglottic (137) laryngeal carcinoma was prospectively staged clinicoendoscopically (CS) and radiologically (RS). These patients were treated from 1974 to 1985 with quality-controlled high-dose radiation therapy. The validity of CS versus RS wa

The process for continuous improvement o
✍ Mary K. Gospodarowicz; Daniel Miller; Patti A. Groome; Frederick L. Greene; Pame πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 61 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract The TNM classification is a worldwide benchmark for reporting the extent of malignant disease and is a major prognostic factor in predicting the outcome of patients with cancer. The objectives for cancer staging were defined by the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM Committee

Redefining pT3 renal cell carcinoma in t
✍ Vitaly Margulis; Pheroze Tamboli; Surena F. Matin; Matthew Meisner; David A. Swa πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 271 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. The 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor classification for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) does not take into account concomitant venous invasion and extrarenal tumor extension (ERE). In the current study, the authors evaluated the prognostic significance of