Sentencing policy and disparity: Guidelines and the influence of legal and democratic subcultures
โ Scribed by Matthew S. Crow; Marc Gertz
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 246 KB
- Volume
- 36
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0047-2352
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
This study analyzed the effects of sentencing policy on sentencing outcomes and the determinants of sentencing decisions. The authors used hierarchical modeling to examine the impact of sentencing reform on legal and individual-and county-level extralegal factors in addition to the sentencing outcomes themselves. The research was framed within the legal and democratic subculture perspective developed by Richardson and Vines (1970) for understanding lower court decision making. The results indicated that sentencing policy acts as a filter, through which cues from each subculture are synthesized, and helps to shape the effects of both legal and extralegal variables on sentencing outcomes.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
The Federal Sentencing Guidelines were developed to provide uniform and standardized punishments for eliminating sentence disparities based on legally irrelevant factors. While research at the individual level showed that extralegal factors continued to affect sentence outcomes, no such research det
Public opinion about sentencing and correctional issues has emerged in recent decades as a salient topic in criminology. Empirical studies have suggested that the public has dynamic perceptions about these criminal justice issues. Sentencing and correctional policy have become key issues confronting
Brian Sears is director of ethics awareness at Lockheed Martin Corporation in Bethesda, Maryland. His responsibilities include managing the development of annual ethics awareness training, overseeing the company's ethics film festival, and coordinating the development of ethics communications.