The place of public fear in sentencing and correctional policy
β Scribed by Carrie L. Cook; Jodi Lane
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 234 KB
- Volume
- 37
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0047-2352
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Public opinion about sentencing and correctional issues has emerged in recent decades as a salient topic in criminology. Empirical studies have suggested that the public has dynamic perceptions about these criminal justice issues. Sentencing and correctional policy have become key issues confronting legislators and policymakers, as correctional budgets and public interest in these areas have increased. Despite the focus on public opinion about sentencing and corrections, previous research has largely ignored how the public feels about the role of policymakers regarding these issues, and what influences opinions about whether public fear should be an important consideration in policy decisions. The current study partly replicated the work of Cullen and colleagues by examining perceptions of crime salience, crime causation, goals of the criminal justice system, and attitudes towards imprisonment and rehabilitation. It uniquely examined perceptions about the importance of legislator consideration of a specific determinant, namely, public fear, in decision making about sentencing and correctional policy.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Dorothy Parker, when she was reviewing for The New Yorker magazine some decades ago, would generally address her audience as the "constant reader." In glancing at the titles in this particular review, the JPAM constant reader might very well wonder what the prevailing theme is of these four seemingl
## Abstract Most policy analyses, especially those on land reform, focus on issues and data that are within the official policy scope. This βpolicy scopeβcenteredβ approach has led to only partial understanding of policy choices, implementation and outcomes. A more complete, and so more powerful, a
fits these women and others into a Whiggish narrative about women's growing presence in public life. The core of Matthews' argument is that throughout American history, "public woman" has been a term of opprobrium, in contrast to "public man," which has been a term of honor. The belief that public