## Abstract Prensky (2001) asserts that because of their total emersion in the digital information environment from birth โโฆtoday's students think and process information fundamentally differently from their predecessorsโ (np). This panel highlights groundโbreaking research on informationโseeking b
Sensitive information: A review and research agenda
โ Scribed by E. Dale Thompson; Michelle L. Kaarst-Brown
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 121 KB
- Volume
- 56
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1532-2882
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Abstract
A basic challenge for intelligence and security informatics is exploring the ways in which humans categorize or classify โsensitiveโ information. Research and practice support the critical nature of categorization frameworks, yet there are a number of different ways humans conceptualize sensitive information. In this paper we review some of the dilemmas associated with classification of sensitive information, present different classification approaches, and then identify alternative propositions related to factors that influence judgments about degree of sensitivity. We conclude with directions for future research.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Presenteeism refers to attending work while ill. Although it is a subject of intense interest to scholars in occupational medicine, relatively few organizational scholars are familiar with the concept. This article traces the development of interest in presenteeism, considers its variou
## Abstract Information Science researchers and designers are wellโpositioned to become active participants in scholarly and institutional conversations concerning the protection of human subjects. The overall goals of this panel are: 1) to extend the discourse within the Information Science field
## Abstract In this article, a case is made for the importance of evolutionary processes and behavioral genetics for organizational behavior. First, we present scientific arguments connecting evolutionary biology and psychology, Darwinian theories, behavioral genetics, and individual differences. S
## Abstract Meyer and Allen's (1991, 1997) three component conceptualization of organizational commitment (OC) includes affective (AC), continuance (CC), and normative (NC) commitment. However, AC and NC have not been as empirically differentiated as theoretically expected. Drawing on the extant li