𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Semiquantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in cancer patients: Variability and changes in tumor tissue over time

✍ Scribed by Milica Medved; Greg Karczmar; Cheng Yang; James Dignam; Thomas F. Gajewski; Hedy Kindler; Everett Vokes; Peter MacEneany; Myrosia T. Mitchell; Walter M. Stadler


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
191 KB
Volume
20
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate variability of a simplified method for measuring semiquantitative DCE‐MRI parameters in patients with cancer and to explore effects of treatment with a putative anti‐angiogenic compound.

Materials and Methods

A total of 19 patients enrolled on treatment trials with the putative anti‐angiogenic agent SU5416 underwent contrast enhanced examinations, and 11 had a second examination eight weeks post therapy. Contrast media concentration as a function of time was calculated using changes in signal and literature baseline T~1~ values in normal muscle or liver reference tissue. Semiquantitative DCE‐MRI parameters, including the area under the contrast concentration vs. time curve (AUC), were calculated for regions‐of‐interest in normal liver and muscle, and in tumors.

Results

The coefficients of variation for pretherapy parameters in normal tissue were 11% to 37%. No significant changes were detected in normal liver over two months of therapy. In tumors and muscle, a significant decrease in the AUC and maximum contrast concentration was observed.

Conclusion

Variability of semiquantitative DCE‐MRI parameters utilizing a method based on known T~1~ values in a reference tissue is low enough to detect changes in tumors during therapy. Use of this method as a pharmacodynamic marker should be further investigated. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004;20:122–128. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Assessment of tumor microcirculation wit
✍ Katja Oberholzer; Andreas Pohlmann; Wolfgang Schreiber; Peter Mildenberger; Pete 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 235 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To investigate the feasibility and impact of dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) on tumor characterization and response to radiochemotherapy (RCT) in patients with esophageal cancer. ## Materials and Methods A total of 48 patients underwent DCE‐M

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using Gd-D
✍ Ruediger E. Port; Michael V. Knopp; Gunnar Brix 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 244 KB 👁 1 views

Gd-DTPA kinetics in arterial blood was investigated by dynamic MRI in 47 patients with malignant and benign mammary tumors. Signal enhancement was monitored for 10 min after the beginning of a 1-min infusion of 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA. Kinetics in blood was biexponential with median half-lives of 21 sec

Correlations between dynamic contrast-en
✍ Masoom A. Haider; Igor Sitartchouk; Timothy P.L. Roberts; Anthony Fyles; Ali T H 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 195 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To correlate permeability (rk~trans~), extracellular volume fraction (rv~e~), relative to muscle and initial area under the enhancement curve (IAUC~60m~) determined by dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) with in vivo measurements of interstitial fl

Haider MA, Sitartchouk I, Roberts TPL, e
📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 32 KB

The formula for calculating relative permeability was incorrectly shown (Eq. [2]) in the published manuscript. The formula as originally published was: The correct formula should have an R muscle term to the right of the integral. R is the change in relaxivity from baseline. The correct formula is