𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Selective separation of n-butanol from aqueous solutions by pervaporation using silicone rubber-coated silicalite membranes

✍ Scribed by Toru Ikegami; Hideyuki Negishi; Keiji Sakaki


Publisher
Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
219 KB
Volume
86
Category
Article
ISSN
0268-2575

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND: To use butanol as a liquid fuel and feedstock, it is necessary to establish processes for refining low‐concentration butanol solutions. Pervaporation (PV) employing hydrophobic silicalite membranes for selective recovery of butanol is a promising approach. In this study, the adsorption behavior of components present in clostridia fermentation broths on membrane material (silicalite powder) was investigated. The potential of PV using silicone rubber‐coated silicalite membranes for the selective separation of butanol from model acetone–butanol–ethanol (ABE) solutions was investigated.

RESULTS: The equilibrium adsorbed amounts of ABE per gram of silicalite from aqueous solutions of binary mixtures at 30 °C increased as follows: ethanol (95 mg) < acetone (100 mg) < n‐butanol (120 mg). The amount of butanol adsorbed is decreased by the adsorption of acetone and butyric acid. In the separation of ternary butanol/water/acetone mixtures, the enrichment factor for acetone decreased, compared with that in binary acetone/water mixtures. In the separation of a model acetone–butanol–ethanol (ABE) fermentation broth containing butyric acid by PV using a silicone rubber‐coated silicalite membrane, the permeate butanol concentration was comparable with that obtained in the separation of a model ABE broth without butyric acid. The total flux decreased with decreasing feed solution pH.

CONCLUSION: A silicone rubber‐coated silicalite membrane exhibited highly selective PV performance in the separation of a model ABE solution. It is very important to demonstrate the effectiveness of PV in the separation of actual clostridia fermentation broths, and to identify the factors affecting PV performance. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Processing of ethanol fermentation broth
✍ Toru Ikegami; Tomotake Morita; Shunichi Nakayama; Hideyuki Negishi; Dai Kitamoto 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English ⚖ 204 KB

## Abstract **BACKGROUND:** Pervaporation employing ethanol‐permselective silicalite membranes as an alternative to distillation is a promising approach for refining low‐concentration bioethanol solutions. However, to make the separation process practicable, it is extremely important to avoid the p

Drastic improvement of bioethanol recove
✍ Toru Ikegami; Dai Kitamoto; Hideyuki Negishi; Kenji Haraya; Hiroyuki Matsuda; Yo 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English ⚖ 128 KB

## Abstract A coupled fermentation/pervaporation process for reliable production of concentrated ethanol was studied using ethanol permselective silicalite membranes coated with two types of silicone rubber, KE‐45 and KE‐108, as a hydrophobic material. Ethanol recovery was greatly improved by using

Stabilized production of highly concentr
✍ Toru Ikegami; Hideyuki Negishi; Hideshi Yanase; Keiji Sakaki; Masayoshi Okamoto; 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English ⚖ 403 KB

## Abstract Since pervaporation performance of ethanol‐permselective silicalite membrane, which is an aluminum‐free hydrophobic zeolite, in the separation of fermentation broths by yeast are negatively affected by succinic acid, the potential of pervaporation using silicone rubber‐coated silicalite